Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relaxation Constants and Relaxivities as Biomarkers in NMR Imaging: Biochemical-NMR Correlation in Medicine

Rakesh Sharma

Abstract


A systematic review on NMR relaxation constants with clinical applications has been performed based on current recommendations by publishers and foundations. An exhaustive overview of currently used NMR techniques and their potential in radiology sciences was obtained by creating a search strategy and explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. PubMed and Elsevier (Scopus & Science Direct) search was narrowed down to few selected studies reporting T1 or T2 constant values of human tissues, resulting in 405 initial studies, out of which approximately 20% were found relevant and exact fit in this review criteria. The nervous system, brain, prostate and connective tissue such as cartilage were analyzed, while the breast subjects were common of studies. There was thin agreement between our previously published T1 or T2 relaxation constant values, and new recent methodologies and experimental setups differed a vast strongly. Scarcely any contemporary (in years 2000-2023) assets have been recognized as devoted to concentrating on the unwinding time constants of tissues for their analytic applications. Most distributions focused on suggested indicative guidelines, for instance, bosom procurement of T1-or T2-weighted pictures were gained in the wake of utilizing gadolinium-based contrast specialists. Because there is still insufficient data to determine whether or not a repeatable or reliable analysis of relaxation times can be used in diagnostics, this remains primarily a restricted clinical research topic. So far, quantitative MRI or qMRI might be recommended as a theranostic help providing general insight into the nature of lesions (benign vs. malignant) and its treatment response. However, additional adjunct means are also necessary to differentiate between specific lesion types.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Sharma R. (1995) The study on NMR relaxation times of biological samples and NMR-Biochemical correlation in Medicine. Ph.D dissertation document (IITDelhi) http://eprint.iitd.ac.in/bitstream/handle

/12345678/4537/TH-2152.pdf?

Sharma R, Trivedi A. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-Biochemical correlation toward deep learning of theranosis and precision medicine.Global Transl Med 2023;1(1):1-27.

https//doi.org/10.36922/gtm.337

Sharma R. Microimaging Assisted With Nano-contrast Agents for Ultra High

Tesla – 36 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of Biological Tissues: Advanced NMR Approach of Translational Medicine. Recent Trends in Information Technology and its Application 2023; Volume 7 Issue 2 e-ISSN: 2584-0991 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10444 307.

Roch, A.; Muller, R.N.; Gillis, P. Theory of proton relaxation induced by superparamagnetic particles. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 5403–5411.

Beall PT, Amtey SR, Kasturi SR. NMR Data Hand Book for Biomedical Applications. Paramagon Press. NY, 1993.

Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer (2010) 46(8):1296–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015

The American Society of Breast Surgeons . Official statements (2017).

Available

at: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/do cs/statements/Consensus-Guideline- on-Diagnostic-and-Screening- Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging-of-the- Breast.pdf (Accessed 20 March 2020)

European Commission . European Guidelines on breast cancer screening and diagnosis . Available at: https://healthcare- quality.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ecibc/europea n-breast-cancer-guidelines

European Commission . Tailored screening in women with high breast

density: Magnetic resonance imaging . Available

at: https://healthcare- quality.jrc.ec.europa.eu/european- breast-cancer-guidelines/dense- breast/MRI.

Bojorquez JZ, Bricq S, Acquitter C, Brunotte F, Walker PM, Lalande A. What are normal relaxation times of tissues at 3 T? Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jan;35:69-80. doi:

1016/j.mri.2016.08.021.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.