Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Application of Artificial Neural Network Algorithm to DGA Diagnosis for Transformer Fault Classification

Swati Karmankar, Praful Tadse, V. M. Pimpalkar

Abstract


One of the most crucial parts of the electrical grid is the power transformer. Due to the high cost of a power loss, extending the lifespan of transformers is essential. Condition monitoring has emerged as the standard method for determining a transformer's overall health, which helps to lessen the likelihood of unexpected failure and guarantees the occurrence of unscheduled outages. Numerous diagnostic approaches have been developed to achieve this aim. Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) is one of the procedures that has gained favor for checking the transformer's condition. For the simple reason that it gives a true picture of the transformer's current condition and the nature of any problems developing inside it. The correct analytical method allows for the removal and identification of dissolved gases. A total of seven gases, including H2, CH4, C2H6, C2H4, C2H2, CO, and CO2, are identified as being crucial. It's possible that rule-based expert systems won't be able to learn from new/novel defect data, and traditional interpretation techniques may not converge on the best answer in most situations. In this research, we use DGA data as inputs to a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network in an effort to identify problems with power transformers. In order to detect these early problems, we propose a three-tiered MLP network. To train the MLP, we use three different training algorithms and assess their diagnostic efficacy: Gradient Descent (GD), Scale Conjugate Gradient (SCG), and Levenberg-Marquardt (LM). The accuracy of the SCG training algorithm is rapidly improving. When compared to more traditional techniques of diagnosis, the suggested MLP network shows promising results.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Duval, M. (1989). Dissolved gas analysis: It can save your transformer. IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 5(6), 22-27.

Transformers Committee. (1991). Guide for the Interpretation of Gases Generated in Oil-Immersed Transformers; IEEE Std C57. 104. IEEE: New York, NY, USA.

Rogers, R. R. (1978). IEEE and IEC codes to interpret incipient faults in transformers, using gas in oil analysis. IEEE transactions on electrical insulation, (5), 349-354.

Wang, Z. (2000). Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis of power transformer incipient faults. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Lin, C. E., Ling, J. M., & Huang, C. L. (1993). An expert system for transformer fault diagnosis using dissolved gas analysis. IEEE transactions on Power Delivery, 8(1), 231-238.

Salami, A., & Pahlevani, P. (2008, April). Neural network approach for fault diagnosis of transformers. In 2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (pp. 1346-1349). IEEE.

Islam, S. M., Wu, T., & Ledwich, G. (2000). A novel fuzzy logic approach to transformer fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and electrical Insulation, 7(2), 177-186.

Salami, A., & Pahlevani, P. (2008, April). Neural network approach for fault diagnosis of transformers. In 2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (pp. 1346-1349). IEEE.

Yu, X., & Zang, H. (2008, April). Transfomer fault diagnosis based on rough sets theory and artificial neural networks. In 2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (pp. 1342-1345). IEEE.

Haykin, S. (1994). Neural Netuorks. A Conprehensive Foundation, 236-284.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.