Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models in Inventory Stock Prediction

Sahaana Kumareshan, Sarvesh Suresh Kumar

Abstract


Accurate inventory forecasting plays an important role in helping organizations maintain sufficient stock while avoiding unnecessary storage and shortage-related costs. With changing customer demand and increasing business complexity, conventional forecasting methods may not always provide reliable predictions. This study investigates the application of machine learning techniques for predicting inventory stock levels using historical inventory data. Three machine learning algorithms—Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting—are implemented and comparatively evaluated. Their predictive performance is assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and R² Score. The comparison focuses on determining how effectively each model can capture patterns within inventory data and estimate future stock requirements. The results indicate differences in predictive performance among the models, with Gradient Boosting achieving the strongest overall performance in the conducted analysis. The study demonstrates that machine learning can serve as an effective decision-support approach for inventory planning and can help organizations make more informed stocking decisions, reduce the likelihood of excess or insufficient inventory, and improve overall inventory management.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Babai, M. Z., Arampatzis, M., Hasni, M., Lolli, F., & Tsadiras, A. (2025). On the use of machine learning in supply chain management: A systematic review. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 36(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpae029

Bergsma, R., de Ruijt, C., & Bhulai, S. (2025). A systematic review of machine learning approaches in inventory control optimization. Operations Research Perspectives, 15, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100367

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e623. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623

Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451

Goltsos, T. E., Syntetos, A. A., Glock, C. H., & Ioannou, G. (2022).

Inventory–forecasting: Mind the gap. European Journal of Operational Research, 299(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.040

Gutierrez, J. C., Polo Triana, S. I., & León Becerra, J. S. (2025). Benefits, challenges, and limitations of inventory control using machine learning algorithms: Literature review. OPSEARCH, 62(3), 1140–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-024-00839-0

Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts. https://otexts.com/fpp3/

Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001

Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.