Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Brick, Infill and Shear Wall Stiffness in Design of RC Framed Irregular Buildings

Mohammed Zameer Ahamed J

Abstract


Earthquakes are considered one of the most devastating natural disasters, causing immense loss of life and livelihood. Passed research works based on experimental and analytical investigations show that the contribution of infill and shear walls to increasing the strength and stiffness of RC-framed regular and irregular buildings cannot be underestimated. An irregular structure is one that lacks symmetry and discontinuity in geometry, mass, or load resisting elements. This project work is concerned with analysing the behaviour of G + 10 storey regular and mass irregular buildings with shear and infill walls. The ETABS software is used for the analysis, which considers equivalent lateral force for regular mass and response spectrum method for irregular mass. Brick infill walls were modelled using the equivalent strut approach. Parameters such as time period and storey displacement are calculated, and graphs are plotted to show the results. The results show that adding shear walls and infill walls to the bare frame reduces the time period and storey displacement, and that regular structures perform better in terms of seismic performance than mass irregular structures.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ye, L.; Lu, X. Analysis on seismic damage of buildings in the Wenchuan earthquake. J. Build. Struct. 2008, 29, 1–9.

Gong, M.; Lin, S.; Sun, J.; Li, S.; Dai, J.; Xie, L. Seismic intensity map and typical structural damage of 2010 Ms 7.1 Yushu earthquake in China. Nat. Hazards 2015, 77, 847–866. [CrossRef]

Holmes, M. Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 1961, 19, 473–478. [CrossRef]

Chaker, A.A.; Cherifati, A. Influence of masonry infill panels on the vibration and stiffness characteristics of R/C frame buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1999, 28, 1061–1065. [CrossRef]

Liauw, T. Tests on multistory infilled frames subject to dynamic lateral loading. J. Proc. 1979, 1979, 551–564.

Angel, R.; Abrams, D.P.; Shapiro, D.; Uzarski, J.; Webster, M. Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infills; Universityof Illinois Engineering Experiment Station: Champaign, IL, USA, 1994.

Dafnis, A.; Kolsch, H.; Reimerdes, H.-G. Arching in masonry walls subjected to earthquake motions. J. Struct. Eng. 2002,128, 153–159. [CrossRef]Mehrabi, A.B.; Benson Shing, P.; Schuller, M.P.; Noland, J.L. Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. J. Struct.Eng. 1996, 122, 228–237. [CrossRef]

Fiorato, A.E. An Investigation of the Interaction of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Filler Walls; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Champaign, IL, USA, 1971.

BANG Haidong, L. Seismic Performance of RC Frames Considering SSI Effect and Stiffness of Infill Wall. J. Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2019, 46. [CrossRef]

Mondal, G.; Tesfamariam, S. Effects of vertical irregularity and thickness of unreinforced masonry infill on the robustness of RC framed buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2014, 43, 205–223. [CrossRef]


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.