Performance Analysis of FBMC and UFMC Technology in 5G Mobile Cellular Communication Systems
Abstract
The key goals of the forthcoming 5G telecommunications standard are high peak data speeds, low latency, the highest quality of service, and greater channel capacity. To meet the aforementioned requirements, waveform production at the physical layer must be flexible. Current 4G-LTE OFDM transmission cannot support 5G communications due to severe limitations such as subcarrier orthogonality, out-of-band radiation, high peak-to-average power ratios, inter-carrier interference, and inter-symbol interference (ISI). A Filter Bank Multi Carrier (FBMC), a Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier (UFMC), and Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing (GFDM) are all various Multi-Carrier Modulation (MCM) systems as a result of a few alterations made to OFDM (GFDM). Multi-carrier systems based on filter banks have recently piqued interest as a possible approach for next-generation wireless communication systems. These systems, however, must evolve into a new multi-carrier approach, universal-filtered multi-carrier, due to their high complexity and extended symbol duration (UFMC). A fixed size of resource block (RB) in conventional UFMC systems limits spectrum use flexibility and enhances computational complexity. Between these MCM systems, FBMC and UFMC have the biggest potential for 5G adoption. The power spectral density (PSD), bit error rate (BER), and peak to average power ratio (PAPR) of the UFMC and FBMC are investigated in this study (PAPR). As a consequence, numerous factors such FFT size, mapping symbol, subcarriers, side lobe attenuation, and filter length are compared between UFMC and FBMC. For the performance evaluation of UFMC and FBMC, MATLAB 2020 was used. UFMC appears to be a superior 5G mobile cellular communication solution than the more standard FBMC, as proven in the simulations.
Bit Error Rate (BER), frequency division multiple access (FBMC), universal-filtered multi-carrier (UFMC), open wireless architecture (OWA), power spectral density
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hoefel, R. P. F. (2013, November). Multi-User OFDM MIMO in IEEE 802.11 ac WLAN: a simulation framework to analysis and synthesis. In 2013 IEEE Latin-America Conference on Communications (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Kamal, S., Azurdia-Meza, C. A., & Lee, K. (2016). Suppressing the effect of ICI power using dual sinc pulses in OFDM-based systems. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 70(7), 953-960.
Pegatoquet, A., Thoen, F., & Paterson, D. (2008, July). Virtual reality for 2.5 G wireless communication modem software development. In 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference (pp. 72-75). IEEE.
Wunder, G., Jung, P., Kasparick, M., Wild, T., Schaich, F., Chen, Y., ... & Wiedmann, F. (2014). 5GNOW: non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 97-105.
Singh, M., & Kumar, V. (2013). Signal scrambling techniques for PAPR reduction in OFDM systems. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 2(1), 311-317.
Barua, B., Pranto, S. M., Al Zubayer, A., Islam, M., Faisal, S. M., & Aktheruzzaman, K. M. (2022). Performance Study on OFDM and FBMC Technology in 5G Mobile Cellular Communication. Journal of Advancement in Communication System, 4(3).
Kumar, A., & Bharti, S. (2017). Design and performance analysis of OFDM and FBMC modulation techniques. The Scientific Bulletin of Electrical Engineering Faculty, 17(2), 30-34.
Wild, T., Schaich, F., & Chen, Y. (2014, August). 5G air interface design based on universal filtered (UF-) OFDM. In 2014 19th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (pp. 699-704). IEEE.
Nissel, R., Schwarz, S., & Rupp, M. (2017). Filter bank multicarrier modulation schemes for future mobile communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(8), 1768-1782.
Farhang-Boroujeny, B. (2011). OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier. IEEE signal processing magazine, 28(3), 92-112.
Schaich, F., & Wild, T. (2014, May). Waveform contenders for 5G—OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC. In 2014 6th international symposium on communications, control and signal processing (ISCCSP) (pp. 457-460). IEEE.
Sahin, A., Guvenc, I., & Arslan, H. (2013). A survey on multicarrier communications: Prototype filters, lattice structures, and implementation aspects. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 16(3), 1312-1338.
Wang, X., Wild, T., Schaich, F., & Dos Santos, A. F. (2014, May). Universal filtered multi-carrier with leakage-based filter optimization. In European Wireless 2014; 20th European Wireless Conference (pp. 1-5). VDE.
Schaich, F., Wild, T., & Chen, Y. (2014, May). Waveform contenders for 5G-suitability for short packet and low latency transmissions. In 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Vakilian, V., Wild, T., Schaich, F., ten Brink, S., & Frigon, J. F. (2013, December). Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE. In 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 223-228). IEEE.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.