Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Experimental Study of Bearing Capacity in Single and Group Stone Columns With and Without Encasement

Mehul Katakiya, Samirsinh P Parmar

Abstract


Stone columns are regarded as one of the most influential soil-stabilizing methods, capable of significantly increasing the strength and workability of soft soil foundations. In this experimental study, some laboratory tests on various model stone columns were performed in order to improve its workability. They are made up of various gravel shapes and particle distributions, as well as columns reinforced with geotextile reinforcements. Model stone column were tested for load carrying capacity. Various soil parameters such as soil moisture content and shear strength variation with respect to depth was also measured. The model stone columns were tested for cased versus uncased condition and also tested for single versus group effect of stone column. The test results were compared appropriately for cased versus uncased condition and single versus group of stone columns. It has been revealed that using, geotextile reinforcements increase their load-carrying capacity, providing a group of stone columns also enhances the consolidation properties of clay and load carrying capacity compared to single stone column. Moisture dissipation in the clay bed was found to be greatest for the group of three stone columns.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bergado D, Singh D N, Sim S, Panichayatum B, Sampaco C, Balasubramaniam A (1990) Improvement of soft Bangkok clay using vertical geotextile band drains compared with granular piles. Geotextile and Geomembrane, 9(3): 203–231

Black J, Sivakumar V, McKinley JD (2007) Performance of clay samples reinforced with vertical granular columns. Can Geotech J 44(1):89–95. https ://doi.org/10.1139/t06-081

Miranda M, Da Costa A (2016) Laboratory analysis of encased stone columns. Geotextile and Geomembrane, 44(3):269–277

Hasan M, Samadhiya N.K. (2018) Soft soils improvement by granular piles reinforced with horizontal geogrid strips. International Journal of Geotech Engineering, 12(1):101–108. https ://doi.org/10.1080/19386 362.2016.12521 39

Dash S.K., Bora M.C. (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotextile and Geomembrane, 41:26–35

Mohanty P., Samanta M. (2015) Experimental and numerical studies on response of the stone column in layered soil. International Journal of Geosynthetics Gr Engineering. 1:1–14

Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy N.R., Latha G.M., (1999) Behavior of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotextile and Geomembrane 17:171–181

Muzammil S.P, Varghese R.M, Joseph J (2018) Numerical simulation of the response of geosynthetic encased stone columns under oil storage tank. International Journal of Geosynthetics & Ground Engineering. 4:4

Ng KS, Tan SA (2015) Stress transfer mechanism in 2D and 3D unit cell models for stone column improved ground. Int J Geosynthetic Gr. Engineering. 1:1–9

Hasan M, Samadhiya NK (2016) Experimental and numerical analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced floating granular piles in soft clays. Int J Geosynthetic and Gr Eng. 2:22:1–3


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.