Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Software Predictive Classification Using Relational Association Rules and Naive Bayes Approach

Swathi. K

Abstract


Software quality is taken into account to be of nice importance within the space of software system engineering and development. So as to extend the potency and also the quality of software system modules, software system defect prediction is employed to spot defect prone modules and this helps in achieving high software system responsibility.  Any software system comes that possess various defects lacks quality and therefore techniques and methodologies for predicting the defects aids to cut back  the defectiveness  throughout  software system testing method which ends in top quality merchandise. Prediction models with input as software system metrics, will predict range of defects in software system modules. Software system metrics are attributes which has method, product or ASCII text file metrics of the computer code. Software fault prediction is usually a posh  space of analysis and software system practitioners and researchers have  applied  various  ways that to predict wherever the fault is probably going to occur within the software system module and their variable degrees of success. These prediction studies ends up in fault prediction models and it permits software system personnel to target the defect free software system code, thereby leading to software system quality improvement and using the higher utility of the resources. During this Paper style Approach for software system Defect Prediction is adopted.


Full Text:

PDF

References


F. Akiyama. An Example of Software System Debugging. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Societies Congress, pages 353–359, 1971.

E. Arisholm, L. C. Briand, and M. Fuglerud. Data mining techniques for building fault-proneness models in telecom java software. In Proceedings of the The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability, ISSRE ’07, pages 215–224, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.

A. Bacchelli, M. D’Ambros, and M. Lanza. Are popular classes more defect prone? In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, FASE’10, pages 59–73, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.

V. R. Basili, L. C. Briand, and W. L. Melo. A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 22:751–761, October 1996.

C. Bird, A. Bachmann, E. Aune, J. Duffy, A. Bernstein, V. Filkov, and P. Devanbu. Fair and Balanced? Bias in Bug-Fix Datasets. In ESEC/FSE’09, 2009. 30

C. Bird, N. Nagappan, B. Murphy, H. Gall, and P. Devanbu. Don’t touch my code!: Examining the effects of ownership on software quality. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium and the 13th European Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE ’11, pages 4–14, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

S. R. Chidamber and C. F. Kemerer. A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 20:476–493, June 1994.

S. D. Conte, H. E. Dunsmore, and V. Y. Shen. Software Engineering Metrics and Models. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA, 1986.

M. D’Ambros, M. Lanza, and R. Robbes. An extensive comparison of bug prediction approaches. In Mining Software Repositories (MSR), 2010 7th IEEE Working Conference on, pages 31 –41, May 2010.

M. D’Ambros, M. Lanza, and R. Robbes. Evaluating defect prediction approaches: A benchmark and an extensive comparison. Empirical Softw. Engg., 17(4-5):531–577, Aug. 2012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.