Comparative Analysis of Tube in Tube Structure and Conventional Moment Resisting Frame with and Without Single Diagonal Bracing Subjected to Lateral Loads
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Naik, B. H., & Chandra, B. S. (2017). Comparative Analysis between Tube in Tube Structure and Conventional Moment Resisting Frame. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(10), 808-812.
Umare A., Sandeshkante(2019). Analysis of G+45 bundled tube structure using different bracing system under the effect of seismic forces. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)6(6).
Baradaran, M., & Madhkhan, M. (2019). Determination of optimal configuration for mega bracing systems in steel frames using genetic algorithm. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(8), 3616-3627.
Patil, D., & Naveena, M. P. (2015). Dynamic Analysis of Steel Tube Structure with Bracing Systems. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology E-ISSN, 2319-1163.
A L K, K Geetha (2016).Dynamic analysis of Bundled Tube steel structure with belt truss and mega bracing. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)3(7).
Shadulla M, M. K.(2018). Analysis of tube in tube structure with different size of inner tube. International Journal Of Technical Innovation Modern Engineering And Science(IJTIMES) Volume 4,Issu 10,Oct-2018
Singh, S., Nandeshwar Lata, D., Nagar, B., & Kumar⁴, R. (2019). Comparative Analysis of RCC Structure and Tube-In-Tube Structure.
Lavanya, T., & Sridhar, S. (2017). SR: Dynamic analysis of tube-in-tube tall buildings. International research journal of engineering and technology, 4(4).
Li, Z., Liu, P., Teng, J., & Wang, Y. (2018). Seismic Performance and Failure Mechanism of Megabraced Frame-Core Tube Structures with Different Brace Patterns. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018.
IS 456:2000 – Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.