Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Farmers’ Socio-economic Characteristics on Transport Modal Choice in Osun State

Ogundele Ayodele Victor

Abstract


Impact of socio-economic characteristics on farmers’ modal choice in Osun State was examined in this study. Furthermore, it examined impact of farmers’ socio-economic characteristics on their transport modal choice in the distribution of agricultural farm produce. Movement of farm produce from areas of low utility and value to areas of high utility has been a major source of concern for rural farmers due to the lack of rural road infrastructural facilities. The availability of rural road transport services and adequate infrastructure is nonetheless essential in order to facilitate effective distribution of agricultural produce. Purposive sampling method was used to select three hundred and eighty-five rural farmers from all the nine farm settlements in Osun State, while structured questionnaires were administered to the selected farmers to elicit appropriate information in relation to the study objective. While multiple regressions were adopted to examine the influence of socio-economic characteristics of the farmers on transport modal choice at 0.05 level of significance. Results revealed that the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers have significant effect on modal choice selection in the study area (R=0.840, F-statistics = 105.725, p<0.05) and the multiple regression model reveals 64.6% variation in the socio-economic factors influencing mode choice selection by the rural farmers. However, only five socio-economic characteristics are significant with beta values for sex (84.0%), level of education (54.0%), age of the farmers (40.6%), farmers’ income (19.5%) and family size (13.0%) while marital status is insignificant (3.4%.) at p<0.05. The study concludes that farmers’ socio-economic characteristics had significant impact on farmers’ modal choice selection. The study therefore recommends that government should improve on its maintenance culture of rural road facilities in the studied area.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abimbola, O. A., Idowu, T. O., & Owoeye B. A. (2015). Determinants of Market Participation among Pineapple Farmers in Aiyedaade Local Government Area, Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Fruit Science, 15(4), Pp 393 – 404.

Ademiluyi, I. A. and Solanke, M. O. (2002). “An Appraisal of Rural Transport Situation for Sustainable Development in Nigeria”. In Ibitoye, O. A. (Ed.) Rural Environment and Sustainable Development. Ado-Ekiti: Petoa Educational Publishers, pp: 174-180.

Afolabi, O. J., Oluwaji, O. A, & Onifade, T. A. (2018). Transportation Factors in the Distribution of Agricultural Produce to Urban Center in Nigeria: Scientific Journal of Transport and Logistics Vol (9), No (1), Doi: 10.2478/logi_2018_0001.

African Development Bank, (2010). African Infrastructure: Retrieved on 6th August 2019 from http://www.afdb.org/en /topics-sectors/sectors/infrastructure.

Agbigbe, W. A., (2016). The Impact of Transportation on Nigeria Economic Development. An Unpublished Ph.D Thesis Walden University Minnesota United States of America.

Ajiboye, A. O., Afolayan, O. (2009). The Impact of Transportation on Agricultural Production in a Developing Country: A Case of Kolanut Production in Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development 2(2), 49–57.

Alfred, S. D. (2018). Attitudinal and Behavioural Change Nexus in Agricultural Extension Unication 97th Inaugural Lecture of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Ale A.S. (2013). Rural Transportation to Food Crop Production‟‟ Journal of Environment, vol-02, issue 05, pp.112-117 .

Annabel, D. (2000).Transport And Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Zambia: A Case Study. Egypt Social Fund for Development Transport Research Laboratory Area Redevelopment Act, (1981).

Barwell, I. (1996). Transport and the Village: Findings from African Village Level Travel and Transport Surveys and Related Studies. World Bank Discussion Paper, No. 344.The World Bank. Washington, DC.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.