Study on High Rise (G+32) Cluster Shaped Building under Earthquake with the help of IS 1893, UBC Codal Provisions
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Izhar, T., Bano, S., & Mumtaz, N. (2019). Comparative Study on Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Building under Seismic Forces for Different Codal Guidelines..
Jayalekshmi, B. R., & Chinmayi, H. K. (2015). Soil–Structure Interaction Effect on Seismic Force Evaluation of RC Framed Buildings with Various Shapes of Shear Wall: As Per IS 1893 and IBC. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 45(3), 254-266.
Ge, Q., Xiong, F., Xie, L., Chen, J., & Yu, M. (2019). Dynamic interaction of soil–Structure cluster. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 123, 16-30.
Shinde, B. H. Seismic Analysis of RCC Multistoried Building by IS 1893: 2016 and it’s Comparison with IS 1893: 2002.
Kohli, A. R., & Gore, N. G. (2017). Analysis and Design of an Earthquake Resistant Structure using STADD. Pro.
Charavande, G., Maru, S. Earthquake Analysis, of RC Structure using Different Codes and Different Countries.
Liu, T., & Zhong, W. (2017). Earthquake responses of near-fault building clusters in mountain city considering viscoelasticity of earth medium and process of fault rupture. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 99, 137-141.
Titiksh, A. (2017). Effects of Irregularities on the Seismic Response of a Medium Rise Structure. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (BHRC), 18(8), 1307-1314.
Malviya, N., & Pahwa, S. (2017). Seismic analysis of high rise building with is code 1893-2002 and is code 1893-2016.
Nahhas, T. M. (2017). A Comparison of Saudi Building Code with 1997 UBC for Provisions of Modal Response Spectrum Analysis Using a Real Building. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 6(02), 98.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.