Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Strengthening and Widening of Flexible Pavement

Hemant Kumar, Dr Umank Mishra, Nikhil Bajpayee

Abstract


Pavements are important for traffic to operate swiftly, safely, and seamlessly. Pavements can be classified as flexible or rigid in general. Flexible pavements have a low flexural strength and a flexible structural reaction. Stiff pavements can be distinguished by their stiffness and flexural strength. Rapid advancements in car technology have resulted in huge moving loads on pre-existing routes in an effort to reduce transportation costs. Existing roads, which were built on general principles, are unable to handle significant wheel loads, resulting in road degradation.
Designing a pavement is a challenging endeavor. Traffic loads is diverse and fluctuates on a daily basis as well as throughout the pavement design process. It is made up of a combination of vehicle, traffic load, axle type, and load distribution. Pavement materials react to stressors such as intensity, temperature, moisture content, loading rate, and so on. To estimate the level of pavement strengthening for updated existing routes, a traffic survey is required. Traffic studies in the region were used to establish the number of traffic lanes and road width, as well as the pavement design and cost analysis of the highway project. In these surveys, determining the average annual daily traffic may be the goal of the traffic survey (AADT). The expected work will result in a determination of whether the present surface has a suitable overlay. To accommodate traffic, the road needs be enlarged. Determine if the material of the pavement is adequate in light of its limiting value.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


AASHTO (1993), 'AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures', American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials, Washington, D C.

Aggarwal S, Jain S S and Parida M (2002), 'A critical Appraisal of pavement management system', Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, Volume 63-2, 327 – 403.

Aggarwal S, Jain S S and Parida M (2005), ‘Use of Pavement Management systems in Developing Countries’, Indian Highways, 5 – 17.

Ali B, Sadek M and Shahrour I (2009), 'Finite Element Model for Urban Pavement Rutting: Analysis of Pavement Rehabilitation Methods', Journal of Transportation Engineering © ASCE, 235 – 239.

Andreas L, Jonathan R and Siman C (2002), ‘Asphalt pavement deterioration models for wild climatic conditions', (web search)

Arya I R, Kamaraj C and Ram A (1999), ‘Maintenance Cost Study on flexible pavements in India’, Highway Research Bulletin, No. 61, 101-115.

Bassam S, Mitri H and Hormoz P (2005), 'Three Dimensional dynamic analysis of flexible conventional pavement foundation', Journal of Transportation Engineering © ASCE, 460-469.

Bexabith A G and Chandra S (2009), 'Comparative Study of Flexible and Rigid Pavements for Different Soil and Traffic Conditions', Journal of Indian Roads Congress, 153 - 162.

Bianchini A, Bandini P and Smith D (2010), 'Interrater reliability of manual pavement distress evaluations', Journal of Transportation Engineering, @ASCE, 165-172.

Bordelon A and Roesler J (2012), 'Design with fiber reinforcement on thin concrete overlays bonded to Asphalt', Journal of Transportation Engineering, @ASCE, 430435.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.