Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Study on Data Science: Ethics and Privacy

Anisha Godse, Akanksha Kulkarni

Abstract


Data science has become an essential tool for extracting valuable insights from vast amounts of data. However, with the increasing use of data science comes the need to address ethical issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the responsible use of data for social good. This paper examines the ethical considerations involved in data science, with a focus on balancing the utility of data with the privacy rights of individuals. The paper first provides an overview of the current ethical landscape in data science, including recent controversies and regulatory frameworks. It then examines specific ethical issues in data science, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, and transparency in decision-making. Finally, the paper presents a set of guidelines for responsible data science practices that aim to balance the utility of data with the privacy rights and welfare of individuals. Overall, the paper highlights the importance of ethical considerations in data science and calls for a more proactive approach to addressing ethical issues in the field. The ethical considerations in data science have become increasingly important as data has become more ubiquitous and powerful. The use of data science in sensitive areas such as healthcare, criminal justice, and finance has raised concerns about the potential for bias, discrimination, and harm. In addition, the collection and use of personal data by companies and governments have raised concerns about the privacy rights of individuals.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732.

European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation. Official Journal of the European Union, L119/1.

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21.

Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2010). Myths and fallacies of "personally identifiable information". Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 24-26.

Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59-68.

Solove, D. J. (2013). Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880-1903.

Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76-99.

Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732.

Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59-68.

European Union. (2016). General data protection regulation. Official Journal of the European Union, L119/1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.