Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhancing Tank Farm Pipeline Protection using Electrical Monitoring Technique

Igbogidi, O. N., Oche, S. E.

Abstract


Steel pipelines for hydrocarbon conveyance usually suffer from galvanic or electrolytic corrosion impact. Their life-span is affected because they deteriorate with time. The consequences of corrosion impacts with associated failures affect the environment, economy, public health and safety. This study seeks to examine the improvement of tank farm pipeline protection using electrical method. The electrical method for the protection of the tank farm pipeline using impressed current cathodic protection system is one out of the many strategies available in protecting the pipeline and other metallic structures buried in soil against corrosion effects in the soil. Corrosion of tank farm pipelines in Nigeria presents a critical challenge, leading to frequent failures, environmental hazards, and substantial economic losses. Existing corrosion protection methods, such as sacrificial anode systems have proven inadequate under the harsh environmental conditions in Nigeria. This study explores the use of impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) to improve the protection of the pipelines. The source of current is photovoltaic ICCP, which offers a more effective solution by providing consistent and controllable corrosion resistance thus, increasing the length of time of the pipelines thereby lowering the cost of maintenance. This was achieved by buring into the soil two metallic pipes of about 300cm by 2.54cm with a thickness of 0.01cm at Akwete, Abia State, Nigeria. One pipe was protected while the other was not. The photovoltaic cell negative terminal was tied to the protected pipe while the anode was extended and buried at depths of 25cm, 35cm, 45cm, 55cm, 65cm, 75cm, 85cm, 95cm, and 105cm, respectively. From the results obtained, depths of 25cm and 35cm satisfied the protection requirement but the cathodic protection was very high as observed from the depth of 65cm with a degree of protection of 96.54%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Etim, E. E., Magajia, A., Etim, I. I., & Ogofothaa, G. O. (2022). Pipeline Corrosion and its Preventions in the Oil and Gas Sector. International Journal of Environment and Bioenergy, 17(1), 1-11.

Enani, J. (2016). Corrosion Control in Oil and Gas Pipelines. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 7(4), 1161-1164. http://www.ijser.org.

Ameh, E. S., & Ikpeseni, S. C. (2017). Pipelines Cathodic Protection Design Methodologies for Impressed Current and Sacrificial Anode Systems. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(4), 1072-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i4.12.

Frankel, G. S. (1998). Pitting Corrosion of Metals. Journal of the Electromechanical Society, 145(6), 2186-2198. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838615.

MatjazFinsgar, J. J. (2014). Application of Corrosion Inhibitors for Steels in Acidic Media for the Oil and Gas Industry. A Review, Corrosion Science, 86: 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.04.044.

Nagalakshmi, T., & Sivasakthi, A. (2021). Corrosion Control, Prevention and Mitigation in Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Explorating Engineering, 9(2), 1568-1572.

Caputo, A., Turbini, L. J., & Perovic, D. D. (2011). Characterization and Electrochemical Mechanism for Bomide-Containing Conductive Anode Filament (CAF) Failure. Journal of Electronic Materials, Springer Nature Link, 40(1), 1884-1894.

Beverskog, B., & Puigdomenech, I. (1997). Revised Pourbaix Diagrams for Nickel at 250C-3000C. Corrosion Science, 39, 969-980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.1838615.

Allahar, K. N., & Orazem, M. E. (2009). On the Extension of CP Models to Address Cathodic Protection Under a Delaminated Coating. Corrosion Science, 51(5), 962-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2009.01.023.

Jankowski, J. (2002). Electrochemical Methods for Corrosion Rate Determination Under Cathodic Polarization Conditions-A Review Part II- AC Methods. Corrosion Reviews, 20(3), 179.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.