Making Cities Safe against the Curse of Urban Flooding
Abstract
Led by uncontrolled migration, ever increasing urabanisation, unplanned urban growth, increased fossil fuel driven mechanical mobility, destroying existing flora& fauna, marginalizing nature, rapidly changing climate and obsolete draining systems, globally cities are becoming increasingly unsafe, under the ever increasing threat and challenges posed by repeated incidences of urban flooding. Floods are known to play havoc with human living, adversely impacting cities, physically, socially, economically and environmentally. Floods are known to destroy and damage essential urban infrastructures besides marginalizing, built environment, flora and fauna. Causing enormous loss of human and animal life, damaging built environment, disrupting critical services, and derailing human living, economy and employment at local level, underscores the criticality and urgency of perpetually managing the urban flooding. Considered as elixir of life, in this era of climate change and global warming, water has emerged as the greatest threat and challenge to the sustainability of urban settlements and human living. Looking at the challenges posed by the urban flooding ,there is an urgent need to study the causes, outline impacts, and define potential mitigation strategies to minimise and eliminate the menace of flooding from urban areas. Considering the need and importance of making cities safe against the natural and manmade disasters perpetuated by flooding, paper tries to examine the role , relevance and importance of rationalizing urban planning , carrying out development based on site suitability analysis, using options of retaining rather than draining water, rationalizing urbanisation and adopting nature based solutions besides involving communities to make cities safe against flooding.
References
• Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., & Chaubey, I. (2012). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(7), 4253-4273.
• Arnold, C. L., & Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 243-258.
• Brownfield Joshua; Strategies for Flood Mitigation and Adaptatio- Causes, Impacts and Mitigation Strategies; https://www.garrisonflood.com/blog/urban-flooding-causes-impacts-and-mitigation-strategy
• Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 171-191.
• Butler, D., & Davies, J. W. (2011). Urban drainage (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
• Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261.
• Environment and Ecology ;What is nature; http://environment-ecology.com/what-is-nature/108-what-is-nature.html
• FEMA. (2021). National flood insurance program: Flood insurance manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
• Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., ... & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525-542.
• Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 93, 101-111.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.