Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Experimental Investigation of the Thermo-Physical Properties of Nanofluids(CuO) and its Effect on a Flat Plate Solar Collector for Desalination Process

M.Mohamed Azarudeen, K. Muralidharan, P.R. Prakash, R. Rajasekar, R.Naveen Kumar

Abstract


Experimental investigations have been carried out for obtaining the thermophysical properties of cupric oxide/water based nanofluids. The CuO/water nanofluid is prepared with the inclusion of surfactant Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate (SDBS), as it provided the best CuO/nano-particle dispersion stability compared to pure water suspension. The volumetric fraction of CuO/water nanofluid was appropriately chosen as 0.05%. Nano-fluids are proficient heat transfer carriers for harvesting thermal energy in solar thermal applications. In this paper, nano-fluids has been utilized in solar thermal research both theoretically as well as experimentally. The effect of density and viscosity of these nano-fluids for solar collector has been investigated experimentally as well. The Solar collector allows solar radiation to pass through to the energy collection surface and helps minimize system heat losses by suppressing convection. Thermal performance has been investigated experimentally on a 250 Litres per Day (LPD). In this paper, silicon solar cells are preferred for various energy requirement purposes since it imparts lower impurity levels during the process. The basin material of Aluminium and chute material of FRP or GRP is predominantly used since it is less reactive with saline water during the desalination process. On the basis of this process, mass flow rate, mass of the steam, solar Radiation are evaluated for different weather conditions of the month of March using the proposed model. Also, the thermo-physical properties of the synthesized nanoparticle and prepared nanofluid were compared theoretically and experimentally. The maximum mass of steam produced using this model is 71.72kg and the minimum mass of steam produced is 21.68 kg. The volumetric efficiency of this proposed model without nano-fluid is 58.36% and Volumetric efficiency of this proposed model with nano fluid is 66.23%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


J.A.Eibling, S.G. Talbert, G.O.G.Loaf, Solar stills for community use – digest of technology, sol.Energy 12(1971)236-276

H.P.Garg, H.S. Mann, Effect of climatic, operational and design parameter on the year round performance of single sloped and double sloped solar still under Indian arid zone condition, sol.Energy 18(1976)159-163

M.A.S. Malik, G.N. Tiwari, A.Kumar, M.S. Sodha, solar distillation, first ed. Pregamon press, UK, 1982

G.N. Tiwari, Recent advances in solar distillation in K.Raj, K.P. Maheshwari, R.L.Sawhney, Solar Energy and Energy conservation, Wiley, Easter, New Delhi 1992,

G.N.Tiwari, H.N. Singh, R Tripathi, Present status of solar distillation, sol energy 75(2003)367-373

A.Trad, A.Kaabi, Effect of orientation on the performance of symmetric solar still with a double effect solar still(Comparison Study), Desalination329(2013)68-77

T. Arunkumar, R. Jayaprakash, D. Denkenberger, A. Ahsan, M.S. Okundamiya, S. Kumar, H. Tanaka, H.S. Aybar, An experimental study on a hemispherical solar still, Desalination 286 (2012) 342–348.

R. Sathyamurthy, H.J. Kennady, P.K. Nagarajan, A. Ahsan, Factors affecting the performance of triangular pyramid solar still, Desalination 344 (2014) 383–390.

T. Rajaseenivasan, K.K. Murugavel, Theoretical and experimental investigation on double basin double slope solar still, Desalination 319 (2013) 25–32.

P.U. Suneesh, R. Jayaprakash, T. Arunkumar, D. Denkenberger, Effect of air flow on “V” type solar still with cotton gauze cooling, Desalination 337 (2014) 1–5.

H.E. Gad, S.S. El-Din, A.A. Hussien, K. Ramzy, Analysis of a conical solar still performance: an experimental study, Sol. Energy 122 (2015) 900–909.

A.E. Kabeel, Performance of solar still with a concave wick evaporation surface, Energy 34 (2009) 1504–1509.

A.S. Abdullah, Improving the performance of stepped solar still, Desalination 319 (2013) 60–65.

F.T. Farshad, M. Dashtban, M. Hamid, Experimental investigation of a weir-type cascade solar still with built-in latent heat energy storage system, Desalination 260(2010) 248–253.

A. Ahsan, T. Fukuhara, Mass and heat transfer model of Tubular Solar Still, Sol. Energy 84 (2010) 1147–1156.

S. Gorjian, B. Ghobadian, T.T. Hashjin, A. Banakar, Experimental performance evalu-ation of a stand-alone point-focus parabolic solar still, Desalination 352 (2014) 1–17.

D.B. Singh, G.N. Tiwari, I.M. Al-Helal, V.K. Dwivedi, J.K. Yadav, Effect of energy matrices on life cycle cost analysis of passive solar stills, Sol. Energy 134 (2016) 9–22.

I. Dincer, The role of exergy in energy policy making, Energ Policy 30 (2002)137–149.

V.K. Dwivedi, Performance Study of Various Designs of Solar Stills(Ph.D thesis) IIT, New Delhi (India), 2009.

J.C. Torchia-Nuñez, M.A. Porta-Ga'ndarab, J.G. Cervantes-de Gortaria, Exergy analysis of a passive solar still, Renew. Energy 33 (2007) 608–616.

S. Vaithilingam, G.S. Esakkimuthu, Energy and exergy analysis of single slope passive solar still: an experimental investigation, Desalin. Water Treat. (2014) 1–12.

A. Hepbalsi, A key review on exegetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy sources for sustainable future, Renew. Sustain. Energy 12 (2007) 593–661.

R.V. Singh, R. Dev, M.M. Hasan, G.N. Tiwari, Comparative energy and exergy analysis of various passive solar distillation systems, World Renewable Energy Congress, Solar Applications, Linkoping, Sweden 2011, pp. 8–13.

M.R. Rajamanickam, A. Ragupathy, Influence of water depth on internal heat and mass transfer in a double slope solar still, Energy Procedia 14 (2012) 1701–1708.

G.N. Tiwari, A. Dimri, A. Chel, Parametric study of an active and passive solar distillation system: energy and exergy analysis, Desalination 242 (2009) 1–18.

K.H. Solangi, S.N. Kazi, M.R. Luhur, A. Badarudin, A. Amiri, R. Sadri, M.N.M. Zubir, S. Gharehkhani, K.H. Teng, A comprehensive review of thermo-physical properties and convective heat transfer to nanofluids, Energy 89 (2015) 1065–1086.

R.A. Taylor, P.E. Phelan, T.E. Otanicar, R. Adrian, R. Prasher, Nanofluid optical property characterization: towards efficient direct absorption solar collectors, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 (2011) 225.

G. Colangelo, E. Favale, P. Miglietta, A. de-Risi, M. Milanese, D. Laforgia, Experimental test of an innovative high concentration nanofluid solar collector, Appl. Energy 154 (2015) 874–881.

G. Colangelo, E. Favale, P. Miglietta, A. de-Risi, D. Laforgia, A new solution for re-duced sedimentation flat panel solar thermalsollector using nanofluids, Appl.Energy 11(2013) 80-93.

R. Said, A. Saidur, Hepbasli, N.A. Rahim, New thermo-physical properties of water based TiO2 nanofluid-the hysteresis phenomenon revisited, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 58 (2014) 85–95.

R. Said, R. Saidur, N.A. Rahim, Optical properties of metal oxides based nanofluids, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 59 (2014) 46–54.

M. Du, G.H. Tang, Optical property of nanofluids with particle agglomeration, Sol. Energy 122 (2015) 864–872.

A.A. Hussien, M.Z. Abdullah, M.A. Al-Nimr, Single-phase heat transfer enhancement in micro/minichannels using nanofluids: theory and applications, Appl. Energy 164 (2016) 733–755.

M.S. Hossain, R. Saidur, M.F.M. Sabri, Z. Said, S. Hassani, Spotlight on available optical properties and models of nanofluids: a review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 43 (2015) 750–762.

S.Z. Heris, M.N. Esfahany, S.G. Etemad, Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer of Al2O3-water nanofluid in circular tube, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 28 (2007)203–210.

J. Albadr, S. Tayal, M. Alasadi, Heat transfer through heat exchanger using Al2O3 nanofluid at different concentrations, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 1 (2013) 38–44.

O. Mahian, A. Kianifar, A.Z. Sahin, S. Wongwises, Entropy generation during Al2O3-water nanofluid flow in a solar collector: effects of tube roughness, NP size, and different thermophysical models, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 78 (2014) 64–75.

I.I. Ryzhkov, A.V. Minakov, The effect of NP diffusion and thermophoresis on convective heat transfer of nanofluid in a circular tube, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 77 (2014) 956–969.

Z. Said, R. Saidur, A. Hepbasli, N.A. Rahim, New thermophysical properties of water based TiO2 nanofluid-the hysteresis phenomenon revisited, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 58 (2014) 85–95.

Z. Said, R. Saidur, N.A. Rahim, Optical properties of metal oxides based nanofluids, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 59 (2014) 46–54.

R.S. Vajjha, D.K. Das, A review and analysis on influence of temperature and concentration of nanofluids on thermophysical properties, heat transfer and pumping power, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 55 (2012) 4063–4078.

G. Huminic, A. Huminic, Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers: a review,Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16 (2015) 5625–5638.

A.E. Kabeel, Z.M. Omara, F.A. Essa, Enhancement of modified solar still integratedwith external condenser using nanofluids: an experimental approach, EnergyConvers. Manag. 78 (2014) 493–498.

T. Elango, A. Kannan, K.K. Murugavel, Performance study on single basin single slopesolar still with different water nanofluids, Desalination 360 (2015) 45–51.

Z.M. Omara, A.E. Kabeel, F.A. Essa, Effect of using nanofluids and providing vacuumon the yield of corrugated wick solar still, Energy Convers. Manag. 103 (2015)965–972.

L. Sahota, G.N. Tiwari, Effect of Al2O3 NPs on the performance of passive doubleslope solar still, Sol, Energy 130 (2016) 260–272.

L. Sahota, G.N. Tiwari, Effect of nanofluids on the performance of passive doubleslope solar still: a comparative study using characteristic curve, Desalination 388(2016) 9–21.

S.W. Sharshir, G. Peng, L. Wu, N. Yang, F.A. Essa, A.H. Elsheikhd, S.I.T. Mohamede, A.E.Kabeel, Enhancing the Solar Still Performance Using Nanofluids and Glass CoverCooling: Experimental Study, Appl. Therm. Eng. 113 (2017) 684–693.

S. Kumar, G.N. Tiwari, Life cycle cost analysis of single slope hybrid (PV/T) activesolar still, Appl. Energy 86 (2009) 1995–2004.

G.N. Tiwari, J.K. Yadav, D.B. Singh, I.M. Al-Helal, A.M. Abdel-Ghany, Exergoeconomicand enviroeconomic analyses of partially covered photovoltaic flat plate collectoractive solar distillation system, Desalination 367 (2015) 186–196.

Z. Said, R. Saidur, N.A. Rahim, Energy and exergy analysis of a flat plate solar collec-tor using different sizes of aluminium oxide based nanofluid, J. Clean. Prod. 133(2016) 518–530.

O. Mahian, A. Kianifar, S.A. Kalogirou, I. Pop, S. Wongwises, A review of the applica-tions of nanofluids in solar energy, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 57 (2013) 582–594.

T.P. Otanicar, J. Golden, Comparative environmental and economic analysis of con-ventional and nanofluid solar hot water technologies, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(2009) 6082–6087.

V. Khullar, H. Tyagi, A study on environmental impact of nanofluid based concen-trating solar water heating system, Int. J. Environ. Stud. 69 (2012) 220–232.

M. Faizal, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef, M.A. Alim, Energy, economic and environmentalanalysis of metal oxides nanofluid for flat-plate solar collector, Energy Convers.Manag. 76 (2013) 162–168.

C. Popiel, J. Wojtkowiak, Simple formulas for thermo-physical properties of liquidwater for heat transfer calculations (from 0 °C to 150 °C), Heat Transf. Eng. 19(1998) 87–101.

G.N. Tiwari, R.K. Mishra, Advanced Renewable Energy Sources, RSC PublishingCambridge, UK, 2012.

B.K. Sovacool, Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: a criticalsurvey, Energ Policy 36 (2008) 2940–2953.

B.J. Huang, T.H. Lin, W.C. Hung, F.S. Sun, Performance evaluation of solar photovolta-ic/thermal systems, Sol. Energy 70 (2001) 443–448.

P.J. Axaopoulos, E.D. Fylladitakis, Performance and economic evaluation of a hybridphotovoltaic/solar system for residential applications, Energy Build. 65 (2013)488–496.

S. Agrawal, G.N. Tiwari, Enviroeconomic analysis and energy matrices of glazed hy-brid photovoltaic module air collector, Sol. Energy 92 (2013) 139–146.

Y.R. Sekhar, K. Sharma, Study of viscosity and specific heat capacity characteristics ofwater-based Al2O3 nanofluids at low particle concentrations, J. Exp. Nanosci. 10(2015) 86–102.

T. Yiamsawasd, A.S. Dalkilic, S. Wongwises, Measurement of specific heat ofnanofluids, Curr. Nanosci. 8 (2012) 939–944.

B.C. Pak, Y.I. Cho, Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron oxide particles, Exp. Heat Transf. J. Therm. Energy Gener. Transp. Storage Convers. 11 (1998) 151–170.

K. Khanafer, K. Vafai, A critical synthesis of thermo-physical characteristics of nanofluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 54 (2011) 4410–4428.

H.E. Patel, T. Sundararajan, S.K. Das, An experimental investigation into the thermal conductivity enhancement in oxide and nanofluids, J. Nanopart. Res. 12 (2010)1015–1031.

K. Sharma, P. Sarma, W. Azmi, R. Mamat, K. Kadirgama, Correlations to predict friction and forced convection heat transfer coefficients of water based nanofluids forturbulent flow in a tube, Int. J. Microsci. Nanoscale Therm. Fluid Transp. Phenom.3 (2010) 283–308.

K.S. Wang, J.H. Lee, S.P. Jang, Buoyancy-driven heat transfer of water-based Al2O3nanofluids in a rectangular cavity, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50 (2007) 4003–4010.

C.J. Ho, M.W. Chen, Z.W. Li, Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluidin a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conduc-tivity, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 51 (2008) 4506–4516.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.