Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of Cost and Embodied Carbon to Select Building Materials and Technologies.

Sanika Upasani

Abstract


Embodied carbon of materials is not currently a driving factor in the choice of structural system and building design in India as of now. However, considering the ambitious goals of sustainability set by India and to keep up with the rapid pace of urbanization, due thought should be given to this parameter of embodied carbon of materials used in structures. Still, no established theory has been proposed for the life cycle carbon assessment of buildings in India. The life cycle of a building has been divided into three stages based on material and energy flow: the materialization stage, incorporating materials preparation and transportation and on-site construction; the operation stage, incorporating daily use, routine maintenance, and engineering renovation; and the disposal stage, incorporating building demolition, waste transportation and recycling and reuse. Carbon emissions related to different construction materials at construction stage, Concrete is the major contributor, followed by Clay bricks with, then steel. Other contributing materials in increasing the carbon emissions are plaster, flooring and POP ceiling. After considering the carbon emissions of alternative materials for walls, it was observed that minimum emissions are generated by CSEB (Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks) followed by fly ash bricks, autoclaved aerated concrete blocks, hollow concrete blocks, solid concrete blocks and clay bricks. CSEB generates only 26.71% of the total carbon emission by clay bricks and fly ash bricks generate 32.73% of carbon emissions as that of clay bricks. Through the exploratory research done in this paper, the importance of embodied carbon, emissions due to conventional building materials and emissions due to alternative building materials and their effect of cost on the structure is highlighted.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Dunant, C. F., Drewniok, M. P., Orr, J. J., & Allwood, J. M. (2021, October). Good early stage design decisions can halve embodied CO2 and lower structural frames’ cost. In Structures (Vol. 33, pp. 343-354). Elsevier..

Lalit, A., & Kumar, K. (2022). Applicability of Shading Devices in Building Design for Reducing Heat; SSN: 2583-0228. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Innovative Research, 2(1), 20-25.

Kumar, K., Basu, D. C., Rastogi, A., & Paul, V. K. (2020). Retrofitting the existing requirements for an institutional building Framework for Enhancing the Functionality. IJSDR, 5(3), 362-368..

Jain, M., & Rawal, R. (2022). Emissions from a net-zero building in India: life cycle assessment. Buildings and Cities, 3(1).

Robati, M., Oldfield, P., Nezhad, A. A., Carmichael, D. G., & Kuru, A. (2021). Carbon value engineering: A framework for integrating embodied carbon and cost reduction strategies in building design. Building and environment, 192, 107620..

Pragya, M., & Kumar, K. (2022). A Review of Performance of Green Roofs for Retrofitting Existing Structures. Journal of Research in Infrastructure Designing, 4(3).

Chan, M., Masrom, M. A. N., & Yasin, S. S. (2022). Selection of low-carbon building materials in construction projects: Construction professionals’ perspectives. Buildings, 12(4), 486..

Prajapati, G., Kumar, K., Batra, R., & Paul, V. K. (2023). Scenario Based Assessment of Smoke Detector Reliability to Mitigate the Associated Risk. Research & Reviews: Journal of Architectural Designing, 4(3).

Kumar, K., & Paul, V. K. (2023). Significance of Fire Protection System Reliability for Structure Fire Safety. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DIGEST, Issue October-December, 42-25.

Kumar, K., & Paul, V. K. (2022). A Critical Review of Risk Factors and Reliability Assessment Issues of Fire and Life Safety in Buildings. Nicmar Journal Of Construction Management, 37, 23-33..

Harit, M., & Kumar, K. (2021). A Critical Review of Expanded Polystyrene Core Panel System in Buildings in India. Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Project Management, 4(3), 1-7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.