Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Battery Management System: Evolution from Conventional Methods to Advanced Intelligent Techniques

Dr. Sangappa K. Rajeshwar, Basagonda Chandrika

Abstract


The rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), renewable-energy storage systems, and portable electronic devices has increased the demand for reliable and efficient battery energy-storage systems. Lithium-ion batteries have become one of the most widely used energy-storage technologies because of their high energy density, high power capability, and relatively long cycle life. However, safe and efficient operation of lithium-ion batteries requires accurate monitoring and control of battery voltage, current, temperature, State of Charge (SOC), State of Health (SOH), and State of Power (SOP). A Battery Management System (BMS) performs these functions and protects the battery against overcharging, over-discharging, excessive current and abnormal temperature. Conventional BMS technologies generally employ methods such as Coulomb counting, open-circuit-voltage (OCV) estimation, threshold-based protection, passive cell balancing, and equivalent-circuit battery models. Although these methods are relatively simple and inexpensive, they suffer from limitations such as accumulated SOC error, dependence on battery operating conditions, energy loss during balancing, parameter variation, and limited prediction capability. Modern BMS technologies incorporate advanced observers, adaptive estimation, Kalman-filter-based algorithms, machine learning, artificial intelligence, cloud connectivity, digital twins, active balancing, and cloud/edge-based battery analytics. These approaches can improve battery-state estimation, fault diagnosis, lifetime prediction, and overall battery utilization. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the evolution of BMS technologies from conventional methods to modern intelligent approaches. The operating principles, advantages, limitations, comparative performance, and future research directions of these techniques are discussed, with particular emphasis on electric-vehicle applications.


Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Plett, Battery Management Systems, Volume I: Battery Modeling. Artech House, 2015.

G. Plett, Battery Management Systems, Volume II: Equivalent-Circuit Methods. Artech House, 2015.

G. Plett, Battery Management Systems, Volume III: Battery State Estimation. Artech House, 2015.

X. Hu, S. Li, and H. Peng, “A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 198, pp. 359–367, Jan. 2012.

X. Hu, F. M. Azad, S. E. R. Mamun, S. Wang, and others, “Battery lifetime prognostics,” Joule, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 310–346, 2020.

H. He, R. Xiong, and J. Fan, “Evaluation of lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit models for state of charge estimation by an experimental approach,” Energies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 582–598, 2011.

H. He, R. Xiong, X. Zhang, F. Sun, and J. Fan, “State-of-charge estimation of the lithium-ion battery using an adaptive extended Kalman filter based on an improved Thevenin model,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1461–1469, May 2011.

G. L. Plett, “Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 1. Background,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 252–261, Aug. 2004.

G. L. Plett, “Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 2. Modeling and identification,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 262–276, Aug. 2004.

G. L. Plett, “Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 3. State and parameter estimation,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 277–292, Aug. 2004.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.