Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mitigating Geotechnical Risks: A Comprehensive Approach to Hazard Management

J Thavaseelan, Dhivakar M, P. Jeyakumar

Abstract


Geotechnical risks pose significant challenges to hazard management, as they can lead to catastrophic events such as landslides, slope failures, and foundation collapses. This project aims to provide a comprehensive approach to mitigating these risks through effective hazard management strategies. The project will begin by conducting a thorough analysis of geotechnical hazards in a specific region, considering factors such as geological conditions, climate patterns, and historical data on previous incidents. This analysis will help identify the most critical areas prone to geotechnical risks and prioritize them for mitigation efforts.
Next, the project will focus on developing a comprehensive risk assessment framework that incorporates both qualitative and quantitative methods. This framework will consider various factors, including slope stability analysis, soil mechanics, and geotechnical instrumentation data, to accurately assess the potential risks and their likelihood of occurrence. Based on the risk assessment, the project will then propose a range of mitigation measures tailored to the specific geotechnical hazards identified. These measures may include slope stabilization techniques, engineered barriers, drainage systems, and early warning systems. Overall, this project aims to provide a holistic approach to geotechnical risk mitigation by integrating scientific analysis, community engagement, and continuous monitoring. By adopting this comprehensive approach to hazard management, we can effectively reduce the impact of geotechnical risks and enhance the resilience of communities facing such hazards.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamson M W, 1973, Contractual Risks in Tunnelling: How They Should be Shared, Tunnels and Tunnelling, pp. 587-598. Abrahamson M W, 1984, Risk Management, Journal of International Construction Law Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 241-264.

. Akintoye A S & MacLoed, 1997, Risk Analysis and Management in Construction, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 31-38.

. Aljohani A, Ahiaga-Dagbui D & Moore D, 2017, Construction Projects Cost Overrun: What Does the Literature Tell Us?, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 137- 143.

. Andersen E S, 1996, Warning: Activity Planning is Hazardous to Your Project’s Health!, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 14, issue 2, pp. 89-94.

. Andersen P H & Kragh H, 2010, Sense and Sensibility: Two Approaches for Using Existing Theory in Theory-Building Qualitative Research, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 49-55.

. Andersson J, 1999, Data and Data Uncertainty – Compilation of Data and Data Uncertainties for Radionuclide Transport Calculations, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Technical report TR-99-09, Stockholm, Sweden.

. Anderson J M, 1997, World Wide Research Points to the Need for New Approaches to Control Tunneling Risks, Tunneling under Difficult Conditions and Rock Mass Classification, In: Proceedings of One Day Seminar and International Conference, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 87-95.

. Andersson L, 1988, The Theory of Possibility and Fuzzy Sets – New Ideas for Risk Analysis and Decision Making, Swedish Council for Building Research, Document D8:1988, Stockholm, Sweden.

. Ang A H-S, 1970, Extended Reliability Basis of Structural Design under Uncertainties, SAE Technical Paper no. 700656.

. Ang A H-S & Tang W H, 1975, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, volume I – Basic Principles, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.