Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessing Anatomy Knowledge: Student Perceptions of Computer-Based Multiple-Choice Examinations in Medical Education

Vidona Willy Barinem, Olugbenga Mary Adeola, Shelu Esther Omonye-Abai, Oviosun Ezinne Chidinma, Ogbe Onome Clementina, Osagiede Newtons Osarumwense, Abudu Enehinkhae Imuentinyan

Abstract


The increasing adoption of computer-based examinations (CBEs) in medical education, has raised important questions about their effectiveness in assessing anatomy, a discipline that relies heavily on visual-spatial and practical understanding. While computer-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs) offer advantages such as efficiency and standardization, their competence in accurately reflecting students’ anatomical knowledge, particularly in resource-constrained settings, remains uncertain. This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed undergraduate students’ perceptions of computer-based MCQ anatomy assessments at Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria. Using a semi-structured online questionnaire, the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS with statistical significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05. The results indicated that most of the respondents found computer-based MCQs easy to understand. Many students stated that the questions covered the relevant areas of the anatomy curriculum. In addition, a good number of respondents preferred the computer-based examination to the traditional paper-based method. Students indicated that computer-based multiple-choice examinations were useful in assessing their knowledge of anatomy. Nonetheless, practical examinations were still considered important and were preferred as a supporting form of assessment. This finding implies that the use of both computer-based MCQs and practical examinations may allow for a more thorough assessment of students’ competence in anatomy.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Hor, M., Almahdi, H., Al-Theyab, M., Mustafa, A. G., Seed Ahmed, M., & Zaqout, S. (2024). Exploring student perceptions on virtual reality in anatomy education: Insights on enjoyment, effectiveness, and preferences. BMC Medical Education, 24(1),1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06370-6

Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students' perceptions of e-assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 147–153.

Bello, H., & Abdullah, N. A. (2021). Investigating the influence of quality factors on user satisfaction with summative computer-based assessment. Electronic Journal of e-Learning,19(6),490–503. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.6.2487

Bhavana, H. T., & Poornima, G. (2017, November). Course end survey: A step towards quality measure and assurance. In 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE) (pp. 21–26). IEEE.

Boyko, M., Turko, O., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Henseruk, H. (2021). The quality of training future teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case from TNPU. Education Sciences, 11(11),660. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110660

Chijioke, A. A. (2024). Students’ perception in the use of computer-based assessment (CBA) in general courses in colleges of education in South East Nigeria. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(2), 682–691.

Dickson, J., Shaw, D. J., Gardiner, A., & Rhind, S. (2024). Testing anatomy: Dissecting spatial and non-spatial knowledge in multiple-choice question assessment. Anatomical Sciences Education,17(1),102–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2323

Ferguson, K. J., Kreiter, C. D., Peterson, M. W., Rowat, J. A., & Elliott, S. T. (2002). Is that your final answer? Relationship of changed answers to overall performance on a computer-based medical school course examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14(1), 20–23.

Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466

Ibrahim, M. I., Varna, T., Maimouna, A. R., & Omar, H. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes of medical students towards two methods of assessing practical anatomy knowledge. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 11(3), 383–390.

Ilgaz, H., & Afacan Adanır, G. (2020). Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them? Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1255–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10020-6

Isabu, M. O., & Asemhokhai, A. S. (2025). Effectiveness of computer-based examination in Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State. Journal of Theoretical and Empirical Studies in Education, 9(2), 369–388.

Israel, C. E., Ugwu, A. O., Madu, O. T., Chikeme, P. C., Omotola, N. J., & Attah, C. A. (2024). Perceived challenges and improvement strategies for computer-based tests in nursing and midwifery council final examinations in Nigeria. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1388. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06413-y

Jawaid, M., Moosa, F. A., Jaleel, F., & Ashraf, J. (2014). Computer-based assessment (CBA): Perception of residents at Dow University of Health Sciences. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences,30(4),688–691. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.5444

Kreiter, C. D., Ferguson, K., & Gruppen, L. D. (1999). Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testingformedicalin-course assessment. Academic Medicine, 74(10), 1125–1128.

Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2021). Experiencing e-assessment during COVID-19: An analysis of Indian students' perception. Higher Education Evaluation and Development,15(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-03-2021-0032

Madaki, S. D., Kadiri, C. K., & Esajobor, O. F. (2020). Computer-based test (CBT) as a panacea to examination malpractice in tertiary institutions. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 7(4), 147–158.

Miller, A. P., Haden, P., Schwartz, P. L., & Loten, E. G. (1997). Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-basedindividual assessment. Academic Medicine, 72(12), 1113–1115.

Muhammad, A. S., & Hayyo, D. (2023). Students’ perception on the role of computer-based tests in curbing examination malpractice. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and development, 12(1), 1511–1518.

Ranganathan, P., & Caduff, C. (2023). Designing and validating a research questionnaire: Part 1. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 14(3), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_14023

Renes, J., van der Vleuten, C. P., & Collares, C. F. (2023). Utility of a multimodal computer-based assessment format for reliability and validity. Medical Teacher, 45(4), 433–441.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2137011

Roach, V. A., Mi, M., Mussell, J., Van Nuland, S. E., Lufler, R. S., DeVeau, K. M., Dunham, S. M., Husmann, P., Herriott, H. L., Edwards, D. N., Doubleday, A. F., Wilson, B. M., & Wilson, A. B. (2021). Correlating spatial ability with anatomy assessment performance: A meta-analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2029

Shaibah, H. S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2013). Validity of multiple-choice practical examinations in gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education,6(3),149–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1325

Woon, C. K., Wong, K. H., Alias, A., Abas, R., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2025). The utility of anatomy assessment in preclinical undergraduate medical curricula: A scoping review. Clinical Anatomy,38(5),576–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24283


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.