COMPARISON BETWEEN AGILE VS WATERFALL MODELS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Abstract

Software engineering has undergone quite a change over the years. It has modified its infrastructure from outdated , rigid processes to hugging approaches that actually embrace the messiness and constant change that occurs in the real world. This paper examines the classical paradigm versus the agile paradigm and specifically the ways in which the agile ecosystem addresses change , collaboration , and software quality when the project experiences unpredictability . We even incorporate chaos theory metrics to explore both paradigms when the project takes a chaotic turn.Consider the waterfall model. This is a process that provides control , documentation , and oversight ability; however , it simply doesn't support the ability to deliver when requirements or priorities change. Agile is structured to address these issues for example, it is built on a foundation of rapid collaboration, feedback, commitment, or simply put, chaos. When considering the charts unlimited comparisons , agile projects may require responsive adaptability, however , agile projects generally deliver at a more constant , consistent rate. Ultimately, this paper states that the challenges is seeking value, just enough, with a combination of the appropriate process management structure, and exploratory methods applying agile best practices, while still delivering software quality with sustained complexity associated with unpredictability.