Structural Performance and Stability Enhancement of Diagrid Systems in High-Rise Buildings: A Review
Abstract
Rapid urbanisation and limited availability of land have increased the demand for high-rise buildings with efficient lateral-load-resisting systems. Diagrid structures have emerged as an effective alternative to conventional moment-resisting and tubular frames because their triangulated perimeter geometry resists gravity and lateral loads primarily through axial action. This review examines the development, structural behaviour, geometric optimisation, material selection, seismic response, and stability enhancement of diagrid systems. Existing studies indicate that diagrids provide high lateral stiffness, reduced storey displacement, lower inter-storey drift, improved torsional resistance, and economical material utilisation. The performance of a diagrid is strongly influenced by its diagonal angle, module height, building aspect ratio, member density, and connection detailing. Most studies identify an angle between approximately 65° and 75° as efficient for medium- and high-rise buildings, although variable-angle systems may be preferable for very slender towers. Steel remains the most widely adopted construction material, while reinforced-concrete and concrete-filled steel-tube diagrids provide alternative solutions. Research on shear-link devices demonstrates that supplemental energy-dissipating elements can improve ductility and seismic behaviour. However, the lateral stability of primary diagonal members between major nodes remains insufficiently studied. Secondary Bracing Systems represent a promising method for reducing displacement, drift, and local instability without substantially increasing structural weight.
References
T. M. Boake, Diagrid Structures: Systems, Connections, Details, 2014.
T. M. Boake, “The emergence of the diagrid—It’s all about the node,” International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 293–304, 2016.
K. S. Moon, “Material-saving design strategies for tall building structures,” in Proceedings of the CTBUH 8th World Congress, 2008.
K. S. Moon, J. J. Connor, and J. E. Fernandez, “Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: Characteristics and methodology for preliminary design,” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 205–230, 2007.
G. M. Montuori, E. Mele, G. Brandonisio, and A. De Luca, “Geometrical patterns for diagrid buildings: Exploring alternative design strategies from the structural point of view,” Engineering Structures, vol. 71, pp. 112–127, 2014.
M. M. Ali and K. S. Moon, “Structural developments in tall buildings: Current trends and future prospects,” Architectural Science Review, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 205–223, 2007.
M. M. Ali and K. S. Moon, “Advances in structural systems for tall buildings: Emerging developments for contemporary urban giants,” Buildings, vol. 8, no. 8, 2018.
K. S. Moon, “Design and construction of steel diagrid structures,” in Proceedings of the National Steel Construction Conference, pp. 398–405, 2009.
J. Leonard, “Investigation of shear lag effect in high-rise buildings with diagrid system,” M.E. thesis, 2007.
J. Kim, Y. Jun, and Y. H. Lee, “Seismic performance evaluation of diagrid system buildings,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Specialty Conference on Disaster Mitigation, pp. 1–9, 2010.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.