

Quantum Cryptography: Advancements and Implications for Network Security
Abstract
Quantum Cryptography has emerged as a revolutionary approach to network security, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to provide unprecedented levels of protection against contemporary and future threats. This paper explores the landscape of quantum cryptography, emphasizing its importance in addressing the dynamic challenges of network security. It outlines four research objectives aimed at investigating various aspects of quantum cryptography and their implications for network security. These objectives encompass exploring advancements in quantum cryptographic protocols, examining practical implementation challenges, assessing threats posed by quantum computers, and evaluating broader implications for security policies and governance frameworks. Through a comparative research design spanning four countries—UK, USA, Indonesia, and Bangladesh—this study collects data on quantum cryptography protocols, implementation challenges, adoption of quantum-resistant cryptography, and governance frameworks. The findings reveal distinct trajectories in the adoption of quantum cryptographic technologies and governance frameworks across these nations. For instance, the adoption rate of quantum cryptography protocols in the USA started at 32.00% in 2010 and decreased to 11.00% by 2023, indicating a gradual decline. Conversely, Bangladesh saw a significant leap in the adoption rate of quantum-resistant cryptography, soaring from 5.00% in 2010 to 80.00% in 2020, reflecting a robust response to emerging threats posed by quantum computing. Despite promising advancements, integrating quantum cryptography into existing networks presents practical challenges, necessitating careful consideration of scalability, compatibility, and performance. Moreover, the emergence of quantum computers underscores the importance of adopting quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques to mitigate potential risks. Ultimately, this research underscores the transformative potential of quantum cryptography in enhancing network security, while highlighting the importance of addressing practical challenges and policy implications to realize its full benefits in the digital age.
References
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (pp. 175-179). IEEE.
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002). Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 145-195.
Ekert, A. K. (1991). Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Physical Review Letters, 67(6), 661-663.
Lo, H. K., & Chau, H. F. (1999). Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances. Science, 283(5410), 2050-2056.
Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N. J., Dusek, M., Lütkenhaus, N., & Peev, M. (2009). The security of practical quantum key distribution. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(3), 1301-1350.
Shor, P. W., & Preskill, J. (2000). Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Physical Review Letters, 85(2), 441-444.
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007). Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Physical Review Letters, 98(23), 230501.
Scarani, V., & Kurtsiefer, C. (2009). The black paper of quantum cryptography: Real implementation problems. Acta Physica Slovaca, 59(5), 465-569.
Gisin, N., & Thew, R. (2007). Quantum communication. Nature Photonics, 1(3), 165-171.
Lo, H. K., & Chau, H. F. (1997). Is quantum bit commitment really possible? Physical Review Letters, 78(17), 3410-3413.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.