Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Unlocking MSME Potential: The Expanding Role of Small Finance Banks

Akshata Hegde, Abhijit Chkaraborty, Anupriya O, Bhargavi R

Abstract


About 63 million businesses make up India's MSME sector, which employs over 100 million people and accounts for nearly 30% of the country's GDP. Despite its strategic economic importance, the sector confronts a persistent credit gap where annual MSME credit demand of ₹36 trillion substantially exceeds formal credit supply of ₹15 trillion, leaving an unmet financing gap of ₹21 trillion. This structural financing constraint forces MSMEs to remain undercapitalized, forgo growth investments, or resort to exploitative informal credit sources. Small Finance Banks (SFBs), licensed beginning in 2014 under regulatory mandates emphasizing financial inclusion and priority sector lending, have emerged as institutional innovations specifically designed to bridge this credit gap. Operating with regulatory requirements to channel 75% of lending to priority sectors, predominantly MSMEs, SFBs combine regulated banking operations with localized outreach and relationship-driven credit assessment methodologies. This research examined the role of SFBs in addressing the MSME credit gap through systematic analysis of secondary quantitative data from ten principal institutional sources employing descriptive statistical techniques including trend analysis, comparative ratio analysis, and geographic distribution assessment.

The findings demonstrate that SFBs have achieved substantial growth in MSME credit provision, collectively disbursing over ₹46,900 crores in MSME credit during FY 2023-24, representing double-digit annual portfolio growth exceeding commercial banking sector expansion rates. SFBs maintain 58-62% of branches in rural and semi-urban regions, substantially exceeding the rural presence of conventional banks, thereby addressing historical market failures in geographically disadvantaged areas. The MSME customer profile served by SFBs reflects genuine financial inclusion, with microenterprises comprising 75% of borrowers, women entrepreneurs representing 30% of clients, and first-time borrowers constituting 40% of customer bases. SFBs consistently exceed priority sector lending targets, allocating 50-55% of portfolios to MSMEs compared to commercial bank rates near regulatory minimums. Financial performance metrics indicate SFB institutional sustainability, with non-performing asset ratios of 2.8-3.1% and capital adequacy ratios of 15.3-16.2%, demonstrating effective credit risk management despite concentration on higher-risk segments. Average loan sizes of ₹4.8-6.5 lakh reflect SFB specialization in micro and small enterprise lending, segments where commercial banks maintain limited presence due to transaction cost economics. Digital innovations including biometric KYC, mobile banking integration, and alternative credit assessment have reduced loan processing times from 10-15 days to 2-4 days, rendering small ticket lending economically viable. Nonetheless, SFBs currently address only 7-8% of the ₹21+ trillion annual MSME financing gap, constrained by capital limitations, higher cost of funds, and sector-specific credit risks. The research concludes that while SFBs have established themselves as significant institutional actors capable of extending credit to previously excluded MSME segments, comprehensive bridging of the credit gap requires multi-institutional approaches combining continued SFB expansion, accelerated commercial bank MSME lending, emergence of alternative financing channels, and complementary policy interventions addressing demand-side constraints through business development and formalization support.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Choudhury, M., & Goswami, C. (2019). MSME financing gaps – Review of literature for the period 2005 to 2016. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 7(2), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.15640/jsbed.v7n2a5

Chitsimran, C., Pandey, A., & Mehak, P. (2020). MSME financing gaps – A review of literature for the period 1960 to 2020. Solid State Technology, 63(6), 18164–18172.

Dela Cruz, N. A. O., Villanueva, A. C. B., Tolin, L., Disse, S., Lensink, R., & White, H. (2025). Effects of interventions to improve access to financial services for micro, small, and medium‐sized enterprises in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 21(1), e70061. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70061

Kumar, D., Phani, B. V., Chilamkurti, N., Saurabh, S., & Ratten, V. (2023). Filling the SME credit gap: A systematic review of blockchain-based SME finance literature. Journal of Trade Science, 11(2/3), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-06-2023-0003

Lin, J. Y., Yang, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Development strategy and the MSMEs finance gap. Journal of Government and Economics, 5,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2022.100034

Nair, T., & Das, K. (2019). Financing the micro and small enterprises in India: Antecedents and emerging challenges. Economic & Political Weekly, 54(3), 37–44.

Rajamani, K., Jan, N. A., Subramani, A. K., & Nirmal Raj, A. (2022). Access to finance: Challenges faced by micro, small, and medium enterprises in India. Engineering Economics, 33(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.33.1.27998

Shankar, S. (2019). The role of credit rating agencies in addressing gaps in micro and small enterprise financing: The case of India (ADBI Working Paper No. 931). Asian Development Bank Institute.

Stefanelli, V., Ferilli, G. B., & Boscia, V. (2022). Exploring the lending business crowdfunding to support SMEs' financing decisions. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,

, 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100278

Whittam, G., Talbot, S., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2015). Can credit unions bridge the gap in lending to SMEs? SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2652176


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.