AI Surveillance vs Fundamental Rights: A Study in the Indian Context
Abstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed surveillance systems, raising critical concerns about its impact on fundamental rights in India. Technologies such as facial recognition, biometric identification, and data analytics are increasingly being deployed for purposes like crime prevention, national security, and smart governance. While these developments enhance efficiency and public safety, they also pose serious risks to individual freedoms, particularly the right to privacy, freedom of expression, and equality guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.
This paper examines the intersection between AI-based surveillance and fundamental rights, focusing on the legal, ethical, and technological dimensions of this issue. It analyzes how large-scale data collection and continuous monitoring can lead to misuse, lack of accountability, and potential discrimination due to algorithmic bias. The study also considers the absence of comprehensive regulatory frameworks in India, which further intensifies these concerns.
Using a descriptive and analytical approach based on secondary sources such as research articles, legal documents, and case studies, the paper evaluates both the benefits and challenges of AI surveillance. The findings suggest that although AI-driven systems contribute to improved governance and security, their unchecked use can undermine democratic values and civil liberties.
The paper concludes that there is an urgent need for a balanced framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and legal safeguards. Effective regulation and ethical implementation of AI technologies are essential to protect fundamental rights while leveraging the benefits of
surveillance systems in a rapidly evolving digital society.
References
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Supreme Court of India. (2017). Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India.
Information Technology Act, 2000
Government of India. (2000). Information Technology Act, 2000.
Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023
Government of India. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885
Government of India. (1885). Indian Telegraph Act, 1885.
Denise Almeida, van der Sloot, B., & Koops, B. J. (2021).
A human rights-based approach to facial recognition technology. Springer.
Gupta, Y. (2023).
Automated Facial Recognition Technology and the Right to Privacy in India. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Smith, M., & Miller, K. (2024).
Public acceptance of AI surveillance and privacy concerns. Technology in Society.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
(2020). Facial recognition technology: Fundamental rights considerations.
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(2019). Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Report.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016).
The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.