Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

Yashika M Gowda, Tanisha Jain A M, Tanisha Jain A M, Vucha Durga Sushma, Vucha Durga Sushma, Varshitha N, Varshitha N

Abstract


Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-traditional machining process used for producing complex geometries in conductive and difficult-to-machine materials. Its process responses depend on interacting electrical and thermal parameters, making prediction and parameter selection suitable for data-driven modelling. This study presents a computational machine-learning workflow for predicting material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (Ra), and tool wear rate (TWR) from pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and peak current. A reproducible synthetic dataset containing 135 operating conditions was generated within the ranges Ton = 3–7 µs, Toff = 2–6 µs, and peak current = 10–30 A. A linear regression baseline, random forest regressor, and multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) were trained using a fixed 75:25 train-test split and evaluated using R2, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Across the three responses, the ANN achieved a mean test-set R2 of 0.7743, compared with 0.6210 for random forest and 0.4840 for the linear baseline. The ANN was subsequently used as a surrogate model for a weighted multi-response optimization that favoured high MRR and low Ra and TWR. The resulting model-derived operating point was Ton = 7 µs, Toff = 2 µs, and peak current = 10 A, with predicted MRR = 1.0314 mm3/min, Ra = 3.7049 µm, and TWR = 0.1001 mm3/min. Because all observations are synthetic, these values are computational proof-of-concept results and must not be interpreted as experimental measurements. The workflow is intended as a reproducible template that can be retrained and experimentally validated using laboratory EDM data.


Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Kumar and T. Gupta, “A review of electrical discharge machining (EDM) and its optimization techniques,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.186.

J. Bharti and S. S. Dhami, “A review of modeling and simulation techniques in EDM process,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.609.

“Integrated multi-response optimisation and predictive modelling of EDM parameters for EN8 steel using Taguchi–GRA–RSM and ANN approaches,” 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102605.

J. M. Corte´s-Mendoza, A. Z˙ yra, and H. Gonza´lez-Ve´lez, “Prediction of machining characteristics in coolant-assisted dry EDM of Inconel 625 and Titanium Grade 2 using Machine Learning,” Measurement, vol. 255, 117966, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117966.

M. N. V. S. A. S. Kotha and K. V. Subbaiah, “Intelligent optimiza-tion of electrical discharge machining parameters for Inconel 718 using Taguchi Grey relational analysis and fuzzy logic,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 163, 113101, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.113101.

“Processing quality prediction and multi-objective optimization of polysilicon wire-EDM,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 192, 109462, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109462.

K. Ullrich, M. von Elling, K. Gutzeit, M. Dix, M. Weigold, J. C. Aurich, R. Wertheim, I. S. Jawahir, and H. Ghadbeigi, “AI-based optimisation of total machining performance: A review,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 50, pp. 40–54, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.01.012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.