Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Anatomy as Well as Physiology, Indications, Contra Indication, Equipment and Treatment of Hysterosalphingogram

Srinivas G., Ramanjaneyulu D.V., Muralinath E., Guruprasad M., Sravani Pragna K., Manjari P., Sony Sharlet E., T. Nikhil, V. Yaswanth Sai, D. Kusuma Latha, R. Faith Rani, P. Megha Varna, Sahil Manoranjan, Malavika Reddy M., K. Sridevi

Abstract


A hysterosalpingogram is a diagnostic imaging technique that is mainly used to evaluate infertility in women. In order to visualize the endometrial cavity and fallopian tubes using fluoroscopy and x-ray techniques and to assess the patency of the fallopian tubes, a contrast dye is injected into the uterus. In order to detect infertility, hysterosalpingograms are unique in that they can evaluate the anatomy of the endometrial cavity and the patency of the fallopian tube. This test is frequently used in conjunction with other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, hysteroscopy, or pelvic ultrasonography.

 

In order to make sure clinicians understand the complexities of a hysterosalpingogram procedure, this activity is intended to enhance their understanding of the procedure's purpose, indications, and techniques, ranging from patient positioning to contrast media considerations. Lastly, by organizing the knowledge and abilities required to effectively use this imaging modality for the diagnosis and treatment of female infertility, this activity will improve patient outcomes and care quality.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Dolinko, A. V., Danilack, V. A., Alvero, R. J., & Snegovskikh, V. V. (2024). Utility of repeat uterine cavity evaluation in the infertility workup. Journal of Women's Health (Larchmt), 33(2), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1020

Hou, J. H., Lu, B. J., Huang, Y. L., Chen, C. H., & Chen, C. H. (2024). Outpatient hysteroscopy impact on subsequent assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis in patients with normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography images. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 22(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01113-5

Makwe, C. C., Ugwu, A. O., Sunmonu, O. H., Yusuf-Awesu, S. A., Ani-Ugwu, N. K., & Olumakinwa, O. E. (2021). Hysterosalpingography findings of female partners of infertile couples attending fertility clinic at Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Pan African Medical Journal, 40, 223. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.40.223.30283

Tsevat, D. G., Wiesenfeld, H. C., Parks, C., & Peipert, J. F. (2017). Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 216(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.104

Ng, K. Y. B., & Cheong, Y. (2019). Hydrosalpinx—Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 59, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.03.004

Ahmadi, F., Siahbazi, S., Akhbari, F., Eslami, B., & Vosough, A. (2013). Hysterosalpingography findings in intrauterine adhesion (Asherman's syndrome): A pictorial essay. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 7(3), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2013.393

Ledbetter, K. A., Shetty, M., & Myers, D. T. (2015). Hysterosalpingography: An imaging atlas with cross-sectional correlation. Abdominal Imaging, 40(6), 1721-1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0582-1

Reyes-Muñoz, E., Vitale, S. G., Alvarado-Rosales, D., Iyune-Cojab, E., Vitagliano, A., Lohmeyer, F. M., Guevara-Gómez, Y. P., Villarreal-Barranca, A., Romo-Yañez, J., Montoya-Estrada, A., Morales-Hernández, F. V., & Aguayo-González, P. (2019). Müllerian anomalies prevalence diagnosed by hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in Mexican infertile women: Results from a cohort study. Diagnostics (Basel), 9(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9040130

Passos, L. G., Terraciano, P., Wolf, N., Oliveira, F. D. S., Almeida, I., & Passos, E. P. (2022). The correlation between Chlamydia trachomatis and female infertility: A systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 44(6), 614-620. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1740794

Maheux-Lacroix, S., Bergeron, C., Moore, L., Bergeron, M. È., Lefebvre, J., Grenier-Ouellette, I., & Dodin, S. (2019). Hysterosalpingosonography is not as effective as hysterosalpingography to increase chances of pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 41(5), 593-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.033

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2018). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 195: Prevention of infection after gynecologic procedures. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131(6), e172-e189. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632

Ma, G., Mao, R., & Zhai, H. (2016). Hyperthyroidism secondary to hysterosalpingography: An extremely rare complication: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore), 95(49), e5588. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005588

Chahine, R., Zadeh, C., Zeid, F. A., & Al-Kutoubi, A. (2024). Hysterosalpingography: A step up for dose reduction. Clinical Radiology, 79(1), e89-e93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.09.015

Canday, M., Yurtkal, A., & Kirat, S. (2023). Evaluation and perspectives on hysterosalpingography (HSG) procedure in infertility: A comprehensive study. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27(15), 7107-7117. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202308_32933

Hindocha, A., Beere, L., O'Flynn, H., Watson, A., & Ahmad, G. (2015). Pain relief in hysterosalpingography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(9), CD006106. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006106.pub3

Brun, J. L., Castan, B., de Barbeyrac, B., Cazanave, C., Charvériat, A., Faure, K., Mignot, S., Verdon, R., Fritel, X., Graesslin, O., CNGOF, & SPILF. (2020). Pelvic inflammatory diseases: Updated French guidelines. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 49(5), 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101714

Aboshama, R. A., Shareef, M. A., AlAmodi, A. A., Kurdi, W., Al-Tuhaifi, M. M., Bintalib, M. G., Sileem, S. A., Abdelazem, O., Abdelhakim, A. M., Sobh, A. M. A., Elbaradie, S. M. Y. (2022). The effect of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on pain perception during and after hysterosalpingography in infertile women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Human Fertility (Cambridge), 25(3), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1909468

Mansour, R., Nada, A., El-Khayat, W., Abdel-Hak, A., & Inany, H. (2011). A simple and relatively painless technique for hysterosalpingography, using a thin catheter and closing the cervix with the vaginal speculum: A pilot study. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 87(1029), 468-471. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2011.121125

Mohd Nor, H., Jayapragasam, K., & Abdullah, B. (2009). Diagnostic image quality of hysterosalpingography: Ionic versus non-ionic water-soluble iodinated contrast media. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 5(3), e29. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.5.3.e29

Peart, J. M., Sim, R. G., & Hofman, P. L. (2021). Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography contrast media in infertile women: What do we know about the H2O in the H2Oil trial and why does it matter? Human Reproduction, 36(3), 529-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa297


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.