Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of ANN, Fuzzy Logic and Regression Tree Models for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting

Vincent P, Dharun Gautham J, Rakhesh A P, Rabin A

Abstract


In water resources planning and management the forecasting of reservoir inflow for various time steps is one of the important components which can help in decision making regarding allocation of water for various sectorial demands and the quantity of water to be reserved for catering to the future demand. The present study demonstrates the capability of three forecasting techniques namely Artificial Neural Network consisting of two layer feed forward neural network with back propagation algorithm, Mamdani type Fuzzy Model and Regression Tree Method consisting of coarse, medium and fine tree models applied in the prediction of weekly inflow values of the Deer Creek Reservoir in Utah, United States. The data used for forecasting is daily data for a span of 60 years comprising of a total of nine parameters. ANN model has been created using 45 year data for training and the remaining 15 year data is used for testing and validation. Optimum architectures have been chosen based on the performance criteria of Root Mean Square Error, Coefficient of Correlation and the Coefficient of Determination. The result of this study has also been compared by evaluating the performance criteria of models created from the three methods of forecasting to choose the best one. The final results concluded that ANN to be an effective tool when compared to the other two methods when forecasting inflow in Deer Creek Reservoir using atmospheric data.

Full Text:

PDF

References


ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(2), 115-123.

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(2), 124-127.

Basheer, I. A., & Hajmeer, M. (2000). Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of microbiological methods, 43(1), 3-31.

Brown M and Harris C (1994). Neuro-fuzzy adaptive modelling and control, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Cheng, C., & Chau, K. W. (2001). Fuzzy Iteration Methodology For Reservoir Flood Control Operation 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(5), 1381-1388..

Firat, M., & Güngör, M. (2008). Hydrological time‐series modelling using an adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(13), 2122-2132.

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J. H., & Friedman, J. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction (Vol. 2, pp. 1-758). New York: springer.

Garbrecht, J. D. (2006). Comparison of three alternative ANN designs for monthly rainfall-runoff simulation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(5), 502-505..

Budu, K. (2014). Comparison of wavelet-based ANN and regression models for reservoir inflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(7), 1385-1400.

Lee, S., & Lee, C. W. (2015). Application of decision-tree model to groundwater productivity-potential mapping. Sustainability, 7(10), 13416-13432.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.