

Contrastive Examination of Learning Techniques Deployed Over Handwritten Digits
Abstract
In today’s world, great leaps and advances have been achieved in the sphere of machine learning, specifically in the sub-sphere of character recognition. In this paper we perform a contrastive examination to compare three major classification algorithms on the basis of accuracy and training times. The techniques were namely, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) with their respective accuracies being 97.85%, 99.93% and 99.96%. They were applied on well-know and well curated MNIST Dataset maintained by Courant Institute - NYU, Google Labs - New York and Microsoft Research - Redmond.
References
http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6449833/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support_vector_machine
http://cvisioncentral.com/resources-wall/?resource=135
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7100687
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6813/ba9ae688f41bb712d1b92a5efc59448d2a92.pdf
http://cs231n.github.io/convolutional-network
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.